Peter Myers Digest: The Palestinian Genocide

(1) Upending the “West’s Dictatorship” —Glenn Greenwald interviews George Galloway
(2) DEI killed the CHIPS Act
(3) Ireland Woke referendum, against Women in the Home, fails. Both parties had urged YES
(4) A Diary from Gaza—Mohammed Alshannat
(5) Israeli army left infants to die at Children’s Hospital
(6) Rabbi Eliyahu Mali calls for genocide of all Palestinians in Gaza
(7) Israeli rabbi says ‘kill everyone in Gaza, including babies’
(8) Rabbi calling for Annihilation of Gazans receives funding from Netanyahu gov’t
(9) The Jewish Agenda of Obama, Macron & Blair

(1) Upending the “West’s Dictatorship” —Glenn Greenwald interviews George Galloway

This is a great interview. As you know, I don’t overload you (dear Reader) with videos, because I understand that it takes time to watch them.

This one takes about 20 minutes. But it’s uplifting; it should give heart to people in Britain and the USA.

Upending the “West’s Dictatorship.” New MP George Galloway on the Next Era of Politics

by<>EDITORMarch 9, 2024

Glenn Greenwald interviews George Galloway after his recent victory in the U.K. Parliament.

Watch the interview at the above link or at

Galloway comes out against Mass Immigration

13.00 “only Trotskyites & Liberals support it”

also 15.00: only the Far Left & Liberals support it.

He’s also against Pronouns.

(2) DEI killed the CHIPS Act

DEI killed the CHIPS Act


DEI — the identity-obsessed dogma that goes by “diversity, equity, and inclusion” — has now trained Google’s new AI to <> refuse to draw white people. What’s even more alarming is that it’s also infected the supply chain that makes the chips powering everything from AI to missiles, endangering national security.

The Biden administration recently <> promised it will finally loosen the purse strings on $39 billion of CHIPS Act grants to encourage semiconductor fabrication in the U.S. But less than a week later, Intel <> announced that it’s putting the brakes on its Columbus factory. The Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) has <> pushed back production at its second Arizona foundry. The remaining major chipmaker, Samsung, just <> delayed its first Texas fab.

This is not the way companies typically respond to multi-billion-dollar subsidies. So what explains chipmakers’ apparent ingratitude? In large part, frustration with DEI requirements embedded in the CHIPS Act.

Commentators have noted that CHIPS and Science Act money has been sluggish. What they haven’t noticed is that it’s because the CHIPS Act is so loaded with DEI pork that it can’t move.

The law contains 19 sections aimed at helping minority groups, including one creating a Chief Diversity Officer at the National Science Foundation, and several prioritizing scientific cooperation with what it calls “minority-serving institutions.” A section called “Opportunity and Inclusion” instructs the Department of Commerce to work with minority-owned businesses and make sure chipmakers “increase the participation of economically disadvantaged individuals in the semiconductor workforce.”

The department <> interprets that as license to diversify. Its <> factsheet asserts that diversity is “critical to strengthening the U.S. semiconductor ecosystem,” adding, “Critically, this must include significant investments to create opportunities for Americans from historically underserved communities.”

The department does not call speed critical, even though the impetus for the CHIPS Act is that 90 percent of the world’s advanced microchips are made in Taiwan, which China is preparing to annex by <> 2027, maybe even <> 2025.

Handouts abound. There’s plenty for the left—requirements that chipmakers submit detailed plans to educate, employ, and train lots of women and people of color, as well as “<> justice-involved individuals,” more commonly known as ex-cons. There’s plenty for the right—veterans and members of rural communities find their way into the typical DEI definition of minorities. There’s even plenty for the planet: Arizona Democrats just <> bragged they’ve won $15 million in CHIPS funding for an ASU project fighting climate change.

That project is going better for Arizona than the actual chips part of the CHIPS Act. Because equity is so critical, the makers of humanity’s most complex technology must rely on local labor and apprentices from all those underrepresented groups, as TSMC discovered to its dismay.

Tired of delays at its first fab, the company <> flew in 500 employees from Taiwan. This angered local workers, since the implication was that they weren’t skilled enough. With CHIPS grants at risk, TSMC caved in December, agreeing to rely on those workers and invest more in training them. A month later, it postponed its second Arizona fab.

Now TSMC has <> revealed plans to build a second fab in Japan. Its first, which broke ground in 2021, is about to begin production. TSMC has learned that when the Japanese promise money, they actually give it, and they allow it to use competent workers. TSMC is also sampling <> Germany’s chip subsidies, as is Intel.

Intel is also building fabs in <> Poland and <> Israel, which means it would rather risk Russian aggression and Hamas rockets over dealing with America’s DEI regime. Samsung is <> pivoting toward making its South Korean homeland the semiconductor superpower after Taiwan falls.

In short, the world’s best chipmakers are tired of being pawns in the CHIPS Act’s political games. They’ve quietly given up on America. Intel must know the coming grants are election-year stunts — mere statements of intent that will not be followed up. Even after due diligence and final agreements, the funds will only be released in dribs and drabs as recipients prove they’re jumping through the appropriate hoops.

For instance, chipmakers have to make sure they hire plenty of female construction workers, even though less than 10 percent of U.S. construction workers are women. They also have to ensure childcare for the female construction workers and engineers who don’t exist yet. They have to remove degree requirements and set “diverse hiring slate policies,” which sounds like code for quotas. They must create plans to do all this with “close and ongoing coordination with on-the-ground stakeholders.”

No wonder Intel politely postponed its Columbus fab and started planning one in <> Ireland. Meanwhile, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo was <> launching a CHIPS-funded training program for historically black colleges.

Now the secretary is <> calling for a second CHIPS Act. Before that, let’s make the one we have usable. There’s an easy fix. A bipartisan group of lawmakers is already trying to pass a bill exempting CHIPS funding from the multiyear environmental review required by the National Environmental Policy Act. The same need for speed calls for adding in a veto of the Commerce Department’s diversity tag-alongs. All Congress has to do is insist it meant what it said in the CHIPS Act and no more: giving poor people opportunities isn’t a free pass to enact all of DEI’s pet causes, and especially not to make national security wait on them. What Congress didn’t give, Congress should be willing to take away.

This is the stuff declining empires are made of. As America pursues national security by building a diverse workforce, China does it by building warships.

The CHIPS Act’s current identity as a jobs program for favored minorities means companies are forced to recruit heavily from every population except white and Asian men already trained in the field. It’s like fishing in all the places you aren’t getting bites.

Instead of solving the problem, the people in charge are trying to cover the problem up just long enough to win reelection. Don’t be fooled by the Biden administration’s upcoming weekend-at-Bernie’s act — the CHIPS Act is dead.

Matt Cole is CEO and Chief Investment Officer for Strive Asset Management, an Ohio-based firm with over $1 billion in assets under management, where Chris Nicholson is head of research.

(3) Ireland Woke referendum, against Women in the Home, fails. Both parties had urged YES

Ireland referendum on family and women’s roles defeated: Varadkar



March 9, 2024

A dual referendum in Ireland on redefining family and women’s roles in the constitution has been defeated, Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said on Saturday.

The government had supported the proposed changes, which would have widened the definition of the family and clarified out-dated language about the duties of women in society.

“I think it’s clear at this stage, that the family amendment and the care amendment referendums have been defeated,” Varadkar said at a press conference in Dublin.

The votes are the latest attempt to reflect the changing face of European Union member Ireland, and the waning influence of the once-dominant Catholic Church.

But by 1200 GMT it was clear that counting was showing a trend towards a “No” on the two questions about care and family.

– Defeated comprehensively –

Varadkar said the referendums had been “defeated comprehensively on a respectable turnout”.

“It was our responsibility to convince a majority of people to vote yes,” he said.

“I think we struggled to convince people of the necessity or need for the referendum at all, let alone detail the wording.

“That’s obviously something we’re going to have to reflect on into the weeks and months ahead.”

The two proposals — called the family amendment and the care amendment — aimed to change the text of Article 41 in the Irish constitution, written in 1937.

The first asked citizens to expand the definition of family from those founded on marriage to also include “durable relationships” such as cohabiting couples and their children.

The second proposed replacing old-fashioned language around a mother’s “duties in the home” with a clause recognising care provided by family members to one another.

The constitution, the core legal text of the nation, can only be modified through a national referendum.

The country of 5.3 million opted to end constitutional limits on same-sex marriage in 2015 and abortion in 2018.

– Smooth passage –

All the major political parties had supported a “Yes-Yes” vote and until recently polls predicted a smooth passage for both on International Women’s Day.

But “No” campaigners argued the concept of “durable relationship” was undefined and confusing and that women and mothers are being “cancelled” from the constitution.

Meanwhile, ultra-conservative voices argued the changes could constitutionally protect polygamous relationships and increase immigration via migrant family reunions — claims all denied by the government.

Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald told reporters the government had failed to convince voters to vote “yes” by not consulting with the opposition “or with other stakeholders.”

“People were left with an unbalanced decision to make and I think it’s a great pity that the government went on this kind of solo run, and they’ve had their answer,” she said.

Ireland’s deputy leader, Micheal Martin has said “the majority were not persuaded by the arguments for changing the Constitution in this way”.

“While the constitutional change was rejected, it is clear that the need for continued action to support families and to respect principles of equality was not challenged,” he said in comments quoted by the Irish Times.

Peadar Toibin, the leader of conservative Aontu part — the only parliamentary party to back a “No-No” vote — told AFP that the outcome of the referendums was “a significant victory” for the people against the political establishment.

The government “sold these amendments as if they were progressive and kind of virtue signalling changes to the Constitution,” he said.

“In reality, there was very little if any net benefit to people in terms of bread and butter support.”

Final results in both votes are expected by late Saturday.

Nearly 3.5 million people were eligible to cast their ballot.

(4) A Diary from Gaza—Mohammed Alshannat

From: Analitykiem <>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:29:06 -0500 Subject: Something in the New York Times
Date: March 9, 2024

It was reprinted at <> It is not clear if it is a letter or op-ed:

“‘People Are Hoping That Israel Nukes Us So We Get Rid of This Pain'”, in New York Times, March 8, 2024.

When President Biden weighs American policy toward Gaza, may he think of a gentle scholar named Mohammed Alshannat. Alshannat is a Palestinian in Gaza who at the start of the war was working remotely on his Ph.D. dissertation in linguistics for Rhodes University in South Africa. He is the opposite of Hamas, for in his writing he has criticized suicide bombings and rocket firings. He admires European democracy and argues that Arabs and Jews can live in harmony. I have been texting him during the war, but his main outside contact has been Lindsay Houghton, a fellow doctoral student at Rhodes. With Alshannat’s permission, I am quoting from his texts to Houghton. I cannot independently verify what he writes, but it meshes with what aid workers describe. I have trimmed for length, but he wrote in English and these are his words:

Oct. 11: The situation in Gaza is very grave. Forgive me as I couldn’t reply any sooner. I was running for my life. Pray for us please!

Oct. 25: My children are very, very sick. They are sick, hungry, thirsty and scared. My kidney stone medicine has run out and I have been drinking salty water. Please pray for my children.

Oct. 26: Last night, there was heavy bombing in our area. We run for our lives and I lost two of my children in the dark. Me and my wife stayed all night searching for them amidst hundreds of airstrikes. We miraculously survived an airstrike and found them fainted in the morning. Please pray for us.

Nov. 4: Please forgive me for not being able to reply to your messages as we are constantly running from one place to another. Internet connection is not stable and one has to wait three days just to charge your mobile. My children can’t move around much as we only eat half a meal a day and I can’t carry them anymore. We defecate in the open and my children defecate on themselves and there is no water to clean them.

Nov. 14: We are eating tree leaves.

Nov. 30: We were completely cut off from the world in the last 15 days. My sister needs an urgent surgery. She is dying slowly before our eyes and we can do nothing about it. Her name is Fatemah and she is a mother of four. Pray for her and us.

Dec. 1 [after a weeklong pause in fighting]: I have managed to get some flour, gas and olive oil. This will sustain us for the following two weeks. We have clean water now. We got sleep during the past seven days. Pray for us please! The war has restarted at 7 a.m. today.

Dec. 4: Fatemah hasn’t yet had her urgent surgery. The world has abandoned us. Pray for us please!

Jan. 27: My son was seriously injured on Dec. 22. A large shrapnel entered his right flank. He is 13 years old and was injured while we were running for our lives. Hospitals are out of service and I had to carry him bleeding under heavy artillery shelling for two hours. I found a doctor who was sheltering in a school, and he took a risk and saved my son’s life. He went through a complicated surgery later and still unable to walk. He is very sick and suffers from malnutrition. I am scared and bone tired. It took me 36 days just to get this internet connection to send a WhatsApp message. Please pray for us!!

Feb. 6: My sister Fatemah hasn’t yet done her surgery and is still waiting in the hospital in the south. Her children are with us in the north and keep asking for their mother. Fatemah wants to go back to the north but Israel does not allow those in the south to go back to the north. She does not want to die alone in the hospital. She wants to die surrounded by her children and family. There is no one to help us to take her to the north to die and be buried here. I am still in the north with my family. We are in a great famine. My injured son’s health is deteriorating because of the famine. There is no milk, meat, vegetables, fruit or anything to feed him. He lost most of his weight. Medicine and other stuff completely disappeared from the markets. My mother’s diabetes medicine has run out and she is very, very sick. My children are crying from hunger all the time. People are hoping that Israel nukes us so we get rid of this pain.

Feb. 11: Rice, on which we have been living off in the last four months, has completely disappeared from the markets. Me and my wife have decided to eat a meal every two days just to keep our kids alive as long as we can. What is left for us is hay. We have started grinding it, bake it and eat it. Because we have started eating the hay bread, we now defecate blood mixed with hay. I lost my house, my car and my olive farm. Yesterday my cousin lost her 2-month-old baby because there is no milk to breastfeed him, because there is nothing for her to eat. He was her only and she is 45 years old. She also lost her house and her husband in December. She is a brilliant brain surgeon. She is refusing food and has not spoken a word since.

Feb. 29: When the Israeli army invades an area, we run to safer places. When they withdraw, some of the Israeli soldiers’ leftovers like tuna cans, bread, etc. remain. My cousin, Esa, thought that they have withdrawn and quickly rushed in the hope that he finds leftovers to eat. After the Israeli army finally withdrew, we found him dead, rotten and half eaten by wild dogs. He seemed to be carrying some tuna cans. We couldn’t bury him as his body was so decomposed. We covered him with sand and left him. His name is Esa Alshannat. He was 20 years old. He was a sophomore student in the department of computer science at Gaza university. He was a brilliant pianist who wanted to pursue a music degree in Italy. I still remember my last meeting with him. He had big dreams and was full of hope, peace and love. He was very hungry and very skinny. We were telling each other that despite what is being inflicted on us, we have nothing against the Israelis but love.

That was the last message from Alshannat. Roughly 1 percent of Gaza’s people today are Hamas fighters. To understand what the other 99 percent are enduring, as the United States supplies weapons for this war and vetoes cease-fire resolutions at the United Nations, think of Alshannat and multiply him by two million.

(5) Israeli army left infants to die at Children’s Hospital

Israeli army left infants to die in Al-Nasr Children’s Hospital: Palestinian doctor

March 9, 2024 at 1:10 pm

“We were surprised that the occupation army left infants to die and their bodies to decompose without allowing anyone to save them,” recounted the Palestinian doctor Mona Sahwil on the “horrific crimes” committed by the Israeli army after it stormed the Al-Nasr Children’s Hospital in Gaza City, Anadolu Agency reports.

Sahwil, who was displaced from the northern to central Gaza Strip as a result of the devastating Israeli war, said she was working as a pediatrician in the intensive care department at the Al-Nasr Children’s Hospital when the “Israeli crime” occurred on Nov. 10.

The doctor, who currently works at the Al-Aqsa Hospital in the city of Deir al-Balah, said the Israeli forces “besieged Al-Nasr Hospital that day, which posed a great danger to us.”

She told Anadolu that after the siege, the medical staff were forced to evacuate the hospital, and “coordination was made with international institutions to transfer the medical staff and sick children to another hospital.”

“We prepared to go out with the children who were on ventilators, but the army entered the hospital and told us to leave them and that an international team would come and transfer them.”

Communication with the hospital was then cut off, and the medical teams and personnel were dispersed, she added.

“After that, we were surprised when we saw pictures of children with decomposing bodies on their beds,” Sahwil said.

“No one took them from the hospital, they remained there until they died and their bodies decomposed,” she noted.

On Feb. 16, the spokesman for the Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza, Ashraf Al-Qudra, confirmed in a statement to Anadolu that five infants had died and that their decomposed bodies were found in the Al-Nasr Hospital.

After the Israeli army withdrew from the Al-Nasr neighborhood, the extent of the massive destruction inside the hospital, with the decomposition of the infants’ bodies and the destruction left behind, horrific scenes emerged where small bones were scattered on the beds.

“Following the Israeli army’s withdrawal from the Al-Nasr neighborhood, the bodies of children were found on hospital beds,” Director-General of the Government Media Office in Gaza Ismail Al-Thawabta told Anadolu.

“The Israeli occupation army committed a massacre against humanity at Al-Nasr Children’s Hospital,” Thawabta said.

He explained that “the Israeli forces forced the doctors to leave the hospital at gunpoint.”

“After 20 days, the medical teams returned to find that the patient children had all died, and their bodies had decomposed, with worms coming out of them,” he added.

Thawabta held Israel, the American administration, and the international community “responsible for this crime.”

Israel has pounded the Gaza Strip since a surprise attack by Hana’s on Oct. 7. The ensuing Israeli attacks have killed more than 30,960 and injured about 72,524 with mass destruction and shortages of necessities, while less than 1,200 Israelis are believed to have been killed in the Hamas attack.

The Israeli war on Gaza has pushed 85% of the territory’s population into internal displacement amid acute shortages of food, clean water, and medicine, while 60% of the enclave’s infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed, according to the UN.

Israel stands accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice. An interim ruling in January ordered Tel Aviv to stop genocidal acts and take measures to guarantee that humanitarian assistance is provided to civilians in Gaza.

(6) Rabbi Eliyahu Mali calls for genocide of all Palestinians in Gaza

Israeli rabbi calls for genocide of all Palestinians in Gaza

ByAl Mayadeen English
Source: Israeli media
Today 18:15

The mass killing of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip “is permissible according to the halakhic principles,” the head of a Jewish religious school in occupied Yafa, Rabbi Eliyahu Mali, stated according to Israeli news website Ynet. <>

A recording of the extremist’s answers to questions on the Gaza Strip was published a few hours ago <> on YouTube and is available for the public.

Halakha or Jewish Law, which also translates to “the way to behave or act,” is held as divine law among Orthodox Jews such as Mali, who called for the extermination of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

When asked about what should be done to infants and the elderly, Mali simply answered, “The same.”

Mali founded the religious school Shirat Moshe and has called upon his students to strictly follow the orders of the Israeli occupation forces, saying that if IOF soldiers do not kill Palestinians, then Palestinians will kill them. It is worth noting that Shirat Moshe students serve in the IOF, despite other schools of Orthodox Judaism refusing military service.

The extremist stressed that the main principle of the war on Gaza is that “no soul remains alive,” urging Israelis to carry on the genocide against Palestinians.

(7) Israeli rabbi says ‘kill everyone in Gaza, including babies’

Israeli rabbi says ‘kill everyone in Gaza, including babies’

Rabbi Eliyahu Mali and his Yeshiva are sponsored by Benjamin Netanyahu’s government

MAR 8, 2024

Rabbi Eliyahu Mali, head of the Shirat Moshe yeshiva (religious school) in the occupied city of Jaffa, <> called on the Israeli army to kill everyone in Gaza, including babies.

During a conference on 8 March, Mali said that “according to the halachic principle (a religious-ethical system of legal reasoning in Judaism), all residents of Gaza must be killed.”

When asked during the conference if babies should be killed as well, he said: “The same thing. You can’t be clever with the Torah. Today he’s a baby, tomorrow he’s a fighter. There are no questions here. Today’s terrorists were previously 8-year-old children.”

“Those who create the terrorists” should also be killed, he said in reference to women in Gaza.

The Rabbi went on to explain that Israel’s war on Gaza is a “Mitzvah war,” which is defined as a war of “commandment” in Jewish tradition. According to Jewish law, this kind of war does not require permission from a “Sanhedrin,” also known as a council or assembly, such as the war against Amalek – previously declared in a biblical reference by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the start of the war on Gaza.

“There is a difference between a civilian population in other places and a civilian population in Gaza. In Gaza, according to estimates, 95 to 98 percent want us destroyed.”

“Since this is a sensitive issue, and I was told that it is being uploaded on the Internet, I want to be ahead of the curve and say that the bottom line is that you have to do exactly what is said in the IDF’s order,” Mali added.

The rabbi’s students in the Shirat Moshe yeshiva serve in the <> Israeli army. The Yeshiva is sponsored by the Israeli government.

Some in Israel have distanced themselves from his rhetoric, such as Israeli Labor Party leader Merav Michaeli.

“Using Halacha does not give any rabbi permission to present Judaism or Israel as bloodthirsty and revengeful. This directly harms the security of the State of Israel and like other distorted statements in the name of Halacha, it will be used by our enemies … I demand that the IDF and the Ministry of Defense stop cooperating with the Yeshiva until the rabbi is fired. The IDF must not allow such dangerous moral corruption in its ranks,” she said.

Mali has long been a controversial figure due to his beliefs. In 2021, shortly before the outbreak of the Sword of Jerusalem battle between Israel and the Gaza resistance, he was <> beaten up by Palestinian citizens of Israel on the streets of occupied Jaffa.

(8) Rabbi calling for Annihilation of Gazans receives funding from Netanyahu gov’t

The Rabbi Calling for Total Annihilation of Gazans is One of Us: How Do We Take Responsibility?

The Rabbi Calling for Total Annihilation of Gazans is One of Us: How Do We Take Responsibility?

March 8, 2024

by Dr. Elana Sztokman

The rabbi of the “yeshiva” in Yaffo has said that he thinks that according to Jewish halakha, all the people in Gaza should be killed. Even the babies.

He said that. Rabbi Eliyahu Mali. Rabbi of the right wing yeshiva in the Ajami neighborhood of Yaffo. Calling for Israel to murder of 2.2 million Gazans, including babies.

Take that in for a second.

A rabbi whose yeshivah is being funded by the government shamelessly calling for the murder of an entire population. Wiping them all out.

This happened. And nothing is being done to stop him or silence him or even defund this guy.

Let’s take that in for a moment.


And btw, his yeshiva students have been assaulting women wearing hijab on the street since October 7. Many women are afraid to leave their homes.

This is happening.

You will be hard-pressed to find a single media report about these events in the Israeli media. But I know women who have been assaulted since October 7. I know women afraid to leave their homes. Because of the guys in this yeshiva.

So there’s that.


And I want to address how this impacts our own self-centered, self-promoting logic driving Israel since Oct 7 and maybe even for the past 25 years. Or more. And how this fits into the larger rhetorical battles in this ugly war.

Some people will read this and try to disavow from Jewish religious leaders like Mali calling for, effectively, genocide, anyone who tries to say, “He doesn’t represent me” or “He doesn’t represent Judaism” or “He’s not mainstream”. Great! Let’s disavow.

But, wait, does that work?

How do we choose who represents us and who doesn’t? When this guy and Ben Gvir and Bibi and whoever else says stuff like this, and have money and platforms and followers to support all this, can we actually legitimately claim that this guy is some kind of outsider?

This guy’s yeshiva receives funding from the government, as part of the governmental agenda to create a Jewish “presence” in Arab communities. This government has no fewer than three ministries with budgets specifically for stuff like this. It’s happening, all over the country, guys like this building yeshivahs preferably in Arab communities, in order to spread their ideas. So that’s real. That is happening.

Actually, the yeshiva’s biggest sponsor is Ben Gvir, who occasionally comes to visit and give, you know hizuk. Make a big public splash with his photographers and his new suit and tie. Show who’s boss, as he likes to say. Who is the “baal habayit”, the landlord, as he likes to say.

Ben Gvir and his 15 mandates. Giving this guy a massive boost.

This rabbi is not “one of us”? He’s not “mainstream” in Israel? He’s not legitimate? Hmmm. Not sure that works.


But I really want to look at this logic of asking WHO is responsible when someone with a platform and a budget and government support says something? Are we responsible? Can we say, “no, no, he’s not one of us, he’s just an outlier?” Can we really make that claim?

I especially want to ask this question because Israel has been arguing that Hamas terrorists are NOT outliers in their communities. That if 30,000 Hamas terrorists live among 2.2 million people, then ALL the people of Gaza hold responsibility for their presence. That any Gazan who did not succeed in rooting out Hamas deserves whatever bombing and starvation and homelessness comes their way. We have been saying for 20+ years that all Gazans are responsible for the presence of Hamas terrorists.

So let’s turn this logic back on ourselves.

If this racist, blood-thirsty so-called rabbi, part of a movement that got 15 mandates, a segment representing over a million Israelis, if they have such a powerful presence in our society, and the rest of us have NOT succeeded in rooting it out (whatever that even means — I mean, I’m also asking what Israel expects non-terrorist Gazans to do about the terrorists among them, and similarly asking what we as non-BenGvir supporters are supposed to do about the spread of his ideas), and if we believe this idea that people who fail to root out the violent creeds spreading in their societies deserve what is coming — that in the case of Gaza, they deserve to be bombed and starved and displaced — then what does that say about US? What do WE ISRAELIS deserve based on the fact that guys like this exist, that they have a following and large budgets and a powerful head of security with his own private militia supporting him? What do WE deserve?

I want us to think about this next time we complain about the way the world talks about us. When we hear people saying that the Israeli army is committing inhumane acts and we are all like, NO NO NO… When the Hague wants to bring us up on charges b/c our Prime Minister and other ministers say things like ‘We will destroy every mosque, every kindergarten in Gaza’ (as Israeli ambassador to the <“> UK Tsipi Hotoveli said on British radio, for example) ….When stuff like that is out there, and we want to push back and say, “NO NO! THEY DIDN’T MEAN IT! IT’S NOT OUR FAULT! WE’VE DONE NOTHING WRONG!” let’s just remember this guy Mali. And ask ourselves if we’ve really done whatever we can to make sure that these ideas do not take root in our society and in our government’s policies.

Have we? Have we done what we can? Do we deserve to be absolved from responsibility here?

Put differently, Israel’s entire strategy in this war, in which the IDF bombs places like kindergartens and schools and hospitals, is that if the people in these places “allow” Hamas terrorists to be in the vicinity and do not “disavow” the violence, then they deserve what’s coming to them.

And so I am asking myself — and Jews and Israelis everywhere — are we disavowing guys like this loudly enough? We want to say they don’t represent us. We want to say that we DO NOT BELIEVE that mass murder and genocide are okay. And yet, we have guys like this saying things like this. So if we’re not disavowing — and not actively trying to stop our own army from carrying out acts that include killing babies and children — then does the rest of the world have the right to say that WE JEWS AND ISRAELIS are supporting a genocidal philosophy? Just as some want to say that all of Gazans deserve what is coming b/c they have Hamas under their noses and don’t do anything about it, maybe we ALSO deserve what’s coming because we have guys like this under our noses and don’t do anything about it? In fact we put guys like this in our government and fund them and do nothing when they engage in everyday street violence against Arabs.

I’m just saying.

(9) The Jewish Agenda of Obama, Macron & Blair

Meet Blobamacron: Three Gentile Narcissists with One Jewish Agenda

Meet BlObaMacron: Three Gentile Narcissists with One Jewish Agenda

March 1, 2024/<> 9 Comments/in <> Featured Articles/by <> Tobias Langdon

Mutato nomine, de te fabula narratur. That’s a Latin saying that applies to a trio of once-great Western nations: Britain, America, France. The <> saying means “With a change of name, the tale is told of thee.” So let’s tell the tale. It goes like this:

A young and charismatic politician dazzles the electorate with promises of change and national renewal. He rides a tide of popular acclaim into the highest office in the land. Now he has the power he sought, but national renewal is slow to arrive. Critics begin to charge him with narcissism and deceit. Rumors circulate about his sexuality. He seems to be happily married, but his wife is peculiar and there are persistent whispers that he’s secretly gay or bisexual. Whatever the truth of that, one thing is certain: he’s deeply in love with the sound of his own voice. Luckily for him, he still has the media with him and he wins big again when he stands for re-election. Alas, his second term proves no more effective than his first. His promises have definitely lost their shine. When he leaves office, the voters he once dazzled are now deeply disillusioned.

Meet BlObaMacron: the three narcissistic shabbos goyim Blair, Obama and Macron (<> images from Wikipedia)

That is, of course, the tale of <> Tony Blair in Britain. But it’s also the tale of <> Barack Obama in America. And the tale of <> Emmanuel Macron in France. These three politicians are so similar that you could give them a single name: BlObaMacron. It’s as though <> Clown World has applied the same script three times in three different countries and found three almost identical actors to play the leading role. A deceitful narcissist rumored to be secretly gay first dazzles, then disillusions. After that, he leaves office and becomes very rich. The script isn’t quite finished in France, because Macron hasn’t left office, but he’s already deep into the stage of disillusion. The voters he once dazzled now understood that they were deceived.

Tony Blair performs the goy-grovel overseen by Jewish supremacist and <> alleged child-rapist Greville Janner (image © PA Wire/Press Association Images)

That’s why Whites in France may react to Clown World’s script in the same way as Whites in America did: by next electing someone that Clown World hates. In America Barack Obama promised racial healing and an end to national division. He delivered the opposite. So Whites elected Donald Trump. In France, Macron promised the same as Obama and, like Obama, has delivered the opposite. Like Blacks in America, Muslims and other non-Whites in France are preying on Whites worse than ever. So disillusioned French Whites may next elect the “far right” <> Marine Le Pen (born 1968) as president. I hope they do, but I fear that Marine could prove as disappointing in office as Meloni has in Italy. That’s Giorgia Meloni, the “far right” leader who entered power loudly promising to reverse the tide of non-White migration and has instead <> allowed it to rise even higher. She was called a fascist tiger; she’s proving to be Clown World’s lapdog.

The world’s most important question

Will Marine Le Pen prove the same? We shall see. One thing is certain: she’s done her best to distance herself from her father, <> Jean-Marie Le Pen (born 1928). He was a tough ex-paratrooper who spoke his mind when he was leader of the Front National. That’s what destroyed his chances of becoming president, because one of the things he spoke his mind about was the Holocaust. He <> said that it was a “detail of history.” Demonized as an antisemite, Jean-Marie was destroyed as a politician. His daughter got the message loud and clear. She knows that she has to appease Jews to have any chance of power. That’s why she’s been so determined to prove that her presidency will answer the world’s most important question in the affirmative.

And what is the world’s most important question? Simple. It runs like this: “Is it good for Jews?” Marine Le Pen wants Jews in France to look at her renamed party and say “Oui!” In other words, she’s been performing the goy-grovel:

When more than 100,000 people marched in Paris against antisemitism on 12 November [2023], one participant attracted particular notice: Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-Right Rasssemblement National (“National Rally”). As <> many recall, the party’s founder, and her father Jean-Marie, was himself a notorious antisemite, and counted veterans of the Waffen SS <> among his early cadres. Was it possible that Marine’s party had showed up for the wrong march?

In fact, the RN leader <> has been denouncing a “new antisemitism” for many years, and trying to build Jewish support for the party. She instigated the party’s greatest rupture with its own past in 2015 when she expelled Jean-Marie from it, and has increasingly sold herself as French Jews’ “<> shield against Islamist ideology”, in the words of her co-leader, Jordan Bardella. But for much of France, the far-Right is still built upon and tainted by antisemitism. Le Pen’s change of position is certainly strategic; whether it is a genuine change of heart is a different question. (“<> Will Marine Le Pen defend French Jews?,” Unherd, 23rd November, 2023)

There has been a “march against antisemitism” in Paris for the same reason as there has been a “march against antisemitism” in London. As I pointed out in “<> Israel über Alles,” Jews imported Muslims and other non-Whites as “<> natural allies” in the Jewish war against the White Christian West. Since October 7 and the Hamas attacks on Israel, Jews have realized with dismay that their “natural allies” are in fact their natural enemies. Antisemitism has risen to horrifying levels all over the West and the political elite in Britain, America, and France have been denouncing it more loudly than ever. Because Marine Le Pen wants to join the political elite, she’s been denouncing it too.

“The first Jewish president”

She learnt the necessity of appeasing Jews from what happened to her father. But she could also have learnt it from BlObaMacron. Tony Blair, Barack Obama, and Emmanuel Macron all won high office by serving Jewish interests and performing the goy-grovel eagerly and often. Blair’s thuggish and Machiavellian press-secretary <> Alastair Campbell once told the Jewish Chronicle that Blair “<> was conscious of the need to have very, very good relations” with “the Jewish community.” Blair was surrounded with Jews both before and after he won high office, just like Obama in America:

Writer Toni Morrison famously dubbed [the eminently blackmailable — because of his close association with Jeffrey Epstein] Bill Clinton “the first black president” — a title he fervently embraced. [A theme here is that BlObaMacron are eminently blackmailable by the Mossad; the same goes for Clinton because of his close association with Jeffrey Epstein and Joe Biden because of his financial corruption with the Chinese.] Abner Mikva, the Chicago Democratic Party stalwart and former Clinton White House counsel, offers a variation on that theme. “If Clinton was our first black president, then Barack Obama is our first Jewish president,” says Mikva, who was among the first to spot the potential of the skinny young law school graduate with the odd name.

“I use a Yiddish expression, yiddishe neshuma, to describe him,” explains Mikva. “It means a Jewish soul. It’s an expression my mother used. It means a sensitive, sympathetic personality, someone who understands where you are coming from.” … “As Jews got to know him, they recognized a kindred spirit, not someone who came down from Mars,” Mikva said. Rabbi Arnold Wolf, of KAM Isaiah Israel synagogue across the street from Obama’s Chicago home, was another early backer. Like Mikva, he sees what he called Obama’s “Jewish side.”

“Obama is from nowhere and everywhere — just like the Jews. He’s black, he’s white, he’s American, he’s Asian, he’s African — and so are we,” Wolf said.

Certainly, Obama is comfortable with Jews, especially Jews from Chicago. Axelrod will remain at his side as senior adviser, and Rep. Rahm Emanuel will be White House chief of staff. Billionaire Penny Pritzker, who has known Obama since the mid-1990s and served as his campaign finance chairwoman, was said to be under consideration for commerce secretary until she took herself out of the running. (<> Barack Obama: The first Jewish president? Chicago circle nurtured him all the way to the top, The Chicago Tribune, 12th December 2008)

And as Obama <> schmoozed Jews in America, Macron was doing the same in France: in 2008, he became an investment banker at Rothschild & Cie Banque. He performed the goy-grovel and was rewarded with the presidency. He’s never stopped grovelling. Indeed, he grovelled so hard in December 2023 that even some Jews were embarrassed by it. In blatant disregard of the long French tradition of secularism, Macron <> stood beside the chief rabbi of France as the rabbi lit a Hanukkah candle in a ceremony at the Elysée Palace, home of the French president and supposed heart of French democracy. Yonathan Arfi, the president of the Representative Council of French Jewish Institutions (CRIF), joined the storm of protest that followed. Arfi <> said that Macron had committed an “error” and that “It’s not the place, within the Elysée, to light a Hanukkah candle, because the republican DNA is to stay away from anything religious.”

Mossad and Macron

In other words, Arfi was worried that Macron was making his subservience to Jews too obvious. Yiddish has a phrase for it: <> shande far di goyim, “shame in front of the gentiles.” It means that something harmful or embarrassing for Jews has been revealed to gentiles. But Jewish control of Macron may reside precisely in their ability to shame him before the world. As I pointed out above, one of the similarities between Blair, Obama, and Macron is that all three are rumored to be secretly gay or bisexual. That similarity may be essential, not incidental, because being secretly gay would make the three goyim highly susceptible to blackmail. Macron’s wife Brigitte is 24 years older than him and a documentary on BFM, “France’s most popular TV news channel,” <> has said that she once “received an anonymous telephone call alleging that her president husband Emmanuel Macron was with a gay lover.” Whether or not the allegation was true, Israeli intelligence has almost certainly done the same in France as it has done using Jeffrey Epstein in America. Epstein <> gathered blackmail material on the American elite for Israel. That’s part of why Jewish control of American politics and media is so complete.

Secularism shmecularism: Emmanuel Macron looks shifty as France’s chief rabbi lights a Hanukkah candle at the Elysée Palace (image <> from BBC and <> Mendel Samama)

Does Mossad have videos and recordings of Macron travelling on <> the Hershey Highway? If it does, that would certainly explain his slavish dedication to serving Jewish interests. Mutato nomine, “with a change of name,” the same would be true of the rumored-to-be-secretly-gay Blair and Obama. Spying and blackmail are Jewish specialities. That’s part of why so many people are suspicious about the “surprise attack” by Hamas on Israel. Before the attack, the Gaza Strip was one of the most closely surveilled and monitored territories on earth. Israeli spying agencies like Unit 8200 have routinely spied on homosexual Palestinians and <> blackmailed them into working against their own people. Has Israel applied the same blackmail techniques to BlObaMacron? I suspect so. I also suspect that Israel applied those techniques to one of Tony Blair’s predecessors as British prime minister and leader of the Labour party. During the <> Jewish hysteria about Jeremy Corbyn’s “antisemitism,” a Jewish historian called Robert Philpot published an article in the Times of Israel that looked back to a happier era:

Harold Wilson may be less well-known internationally than Margaret Thatcher or Tony Blair, but he dominated British politics for much of the 1960s and 1970s — and remains the only modern-day prime minister to win four general elections. … Famously pragmatic — critics claimed unprincipled — the former prime minister’s name became for a time synonymous with the wheeler-dealing and political game-playing in which he undoubtedly reveled. As one contemporary newspaper columnist suggested, Wilson’s image was “a dark serpentine crawling trimmer, shifty and shuffling, devious, untrustworthy, constant only in the pursuit of self-preservation and narrow party advantage.” For the historian Dominic Sandbrook, Wilson was “a brilliant opportunist.”

There was, however, a limit to Wilson’s alleged opportunism. As the left wing and veteran Zionist Labour MP, Ian Mikardo, once argued: “I don’t think Harold … [had] any doctrinal beliefs at all. Except for one, which I find utterly incomprehensible, which is his devotion to the cause of Israel.” Wilson’s leadership arguably marked the high point of the relationship between Labour and British Jews, a bond which has today been strained by Jeremy Corbyn’s strident anti-Zionism and the allegations of anti-Semitism which continue to rock the party. (“<> When the UK’s left-wing prime minister was one of Israel’s closest friends,” The Times of Israel, 30th March 2019)

Harold Wilson, “devious,” “untrustworthy,” and a staunch Friend of Israel (image from <> Labour Friends of Israel)

Why did the “veteran Zionist” <> Ian Mikardo think that Wilson’s “devotion” to Israel was “utterly incomprehensible”? Mikardo was himself Jewish and presumably realized that Wilson wasn’t a natural philosemite. But perhaps that unshakeable Zionism was only “incomprehensible” to those without the full facts. But if Israel was blackmailing the “devious” and “untrustworthy” Wilson, his devotion becomes perfectly comprehensible. Tony Blair is also “devious,” “untrustworthy,” and a staunch Friend of Israel. And like Blair, Wilson had a close Jewish associate who became involved in a financial scandal. Blair’s associate <,_Baron_Levy> Lord Levy was investigated, but not prosecuted and jailed, for allegedly selling honors to rich Jews who made secret donations to the Labour party. Wilson’s associate <,_Baron_Kagan> Lord Kagan actually was jailed for fraud when he was “<> forced to return to England” after seeking refuge (can you guess where?) in Israel.

The parallels between Blair and Wilson don’t end there. Both of them became leader of the Labour party only after the unexpected and premature death of the previous leader. As Wikipedia <> puts it: “The shock of [Hugh] Gaitskell’s death [in 1963] was comparable to that of the sudden death of the later Labour Party leader John Smith, in May 1994, when he too seemed to be on the threshold of [becoming prime minister].” Fancy that! Those staunch Friends of Israel Wilson and Blair both reached the highest office in the land thanks to a lucky accident. Of course, it wasn’t lucky for Hugh Gaitskell or John Smith. But it was lucky for Wilson and Blair. And even luckier for Israel, which had warm friends in power instead of the more distant Gaitskell and Smith.

Labour’s toxic transformation

So did Israel assassinate Gaitskell and Smith to clear the path to power for its shabbos goyim Wilson and Blair? Well, I started this article with some Latin, so I’ll end it and answer the question with some Italian: <> se no è vero, è ben trovato. That roughly means: “If it’s not true, it should be.” History clearly proves that Wilson and Blair displayed slavish “devotion to the cause of Israel.” But it also proves that neither displayed any devotion at all to the cause of the White working-class. Under Harold Wilson, the Labour party, founded to champion the White working-class, began to turn into a dedicated enemy of the White working-class.

By the time Tony Blair entered Downing Street, that transformation <> from champion to enemy was complete. The transformation was overseen by Jews and carried out by shabbos goyim. That’s why it would make a perfect story if Israel did indeed assassinate Gaitskell and Smith to put Wilson and Blair into office. Jews hate Whites and their shabbos goyim know that they have to harm Whites once they get into power. Harming Whites is precisely what Harold Wilson and BlObaMacron have done.